Unfortunately, I believe fandom_scruples has already been reported, and from some info I got from Fandom Wank, here's what happened about it:
Furthermore, LJ admin's current position is that f_s's actions haven't yet been against TOS, and that they aren't responsible for f_s's actions on other sites. Debate over this has been going on as we speak; no definitive conclusion has yet been reached.
And later on:
LJ admin are closing support requests from those who won't take "fandom_scruples hasn't actually violated the TOS" as an answer. Which says good things for LJ's support of free speech, which means that LJ won't likely target those with smut in their journals if f_s gets all uppity at them, but bad for justice being served on f_s.
So I guess there's not much more to be done at this point. *sigh* It's pretty much just waiting for their next move to see if they're going to go through with their stupid threats or if it's all just empty. *shrugs* Personally, I am more scared at the thought that there are people like fandom_scruples than by whatever threat they're making.
no subject
Furthermore, LJ admin's current position is that f_s's actions haven't yet been against TOS, and that they aren't responsible for f_s's actions on other sites. Debate over this has been going on as we speak; no definitive conclusion has yet been reached.
And later on:
LJ admin are closing support requests from those who won't take "fandom_scruples hasn't actually violated the TOS" as an answer. Which says good things for LJ's support of free speech, which means that LJ won't likely target those with smut in their journals if f_s gets all uppity at them, but bad for justice being served on f_s.
So I guess there's not much more to be done at this point. *sigh* It's pretty much just waiting for their next move to see if they're going to go through with their stupid threats or if it's all just empty. *shrugs* Personally, I am more scared at the thought that there are people like